Տեսակ - Կուրսային, անհատական և ստուգողական աշխատանքներ
Գին - 4750 դրամ
Առարկա - Անգլերեն լեզվով
Էջեր - 19
Chapter 1. Theory of Functional-Semantic Field
Chapter 2. Peculiarities of adjectives clever, smart, intelligent.
General Notion of Adjectives
1. Adjective Intelligent
2. Adjective Clever
3. Adjective Smart
4. Peculiarities of use of adjectives clever, intelligent and smart
Conclusion
2. Н. А. Кобрина, Е. А. Корнеева, М. И. Оссовская, К. А. Гузеева, Грамматика английского языка: Морфология. Синтаксис. Учебное пособие для студентов педагогических институтов и университетов по специальности № 2103 "Иностранные языки". - СПб., СОЮЗ, 1999.
3. А.К. Кравченко, Л.В. Ушакова и др. “The English verb. A new grammar for every one”, Иркутск, 1997.
4. Смирницкий А.И., “Морфология английского языка”, М., 1959.
5. Грузинская И.А., “Грамматика английского языка”, М., 1954
6. Каушанская В. Л., “Грамматика английского языка”. Пособие для студентов педагогических институтов, Ленинград 1963
7. И.П. Крылова, Е. М. Гордон “Грамматика современного английского языка”, Москва, 2003
8. Бондарко А.В., Функционально-семантическое поле//Большой энциклопедический словарь: Языкознание. – М.: Большая российская энциклопедия, 1998. – С. 566-567.
9. Павлов В.М., Полевые структуры в строе языка. – М., 1996.
10. Адмони В.Г., Основы теории грамматики- М. Л Наука, 1964
11. Арнольд И.В., Современные лингвистические теории взаимодействия системы и среды// Вопросы языкознания – 1991
12. .....
Functional approach to language studies presupposes investigation of language facts and phenomena in the process of their functioning with the aim of elucidation functional semantic paradigms, systemic organization of vocabulary and establishing the law-governed nature of lexical fields functioning in language system.
The field principle conception of the system organization of linguistic facts is fairly considered to be one of the most significant achievements of the XX century linguistics. The concept of “field” traces back to the definition of language as the system, representing the complex mechanism, which was theoretically substantiated by I. O. Baudouin de Courtenay and F. de Saussure. Scholars of different generations, national schools and directions, interpret the term “field” differently; this fact reveals different approaches to the problem development, rather than the differences of fundamental theoretical character.
The increasing interest to the functional side of the language phenomena is typical for the modern linguistics.
The concept of Slyusareva about the realization of four aspects of syntax: actual, analogue, logical-oriented and structural, in the morphological units is quite interesting. This allows to consider the morphological categories from the viewpoint of expression of main functions of language, i.e. communicative and cognitive (Slyusareva, 1986).
According to Kobrina, “the functional load of the units of different levels becomes complicated and qualitatively enriched by levels in the direction upwards due to the fact that the functional manifestation of the units of low level are integrated with the units of upper level.” (Kobrina, 1981: 44).
The dictionaries state that the adjectives clever and smart can be used as derogatory terms for a person who shows a high level of intellectual achievement but uses it in a dishonest way. Clever is said to be often used in ironic context. Smart appears to collocate with objects that are highly efficient and intelligently designed.
From all the above reasoning it is clear that it’s rightfully to draw the following conclusions:
The term of “linguistic field”, firstly, contains the idea of grouping (of serially ordered set) of dissimilar linguistic means;
The features of elements connection and interdependence are the most important inner qualities;
Field is of systematic character and represents some place, where the centre (nucleus or frame), basing on grammar category and Characterizing with density and maximum features concentration specific for this field, is separated, around which other (peripheral) means are grouped, and the zones of interception (passages) of other fields are marked.
According to their meaning and grammatical characteristics adjectives fall under two classes: qualitative adjectives and relative adjectives.